End of the Renaissance?

A remembrance of the RenCen

By Todd Lassa*

First time I saw Detroit’s Renaissance Center was 1982, when my friend Tom Cesarz and I borrowed my dad’s 1980 Mazda RX-7 to drive the 375 miles from Milwaukee (Dad always was generous about letting me drive it) to attend our first-ever live Formula 1 race.

We showed up early Saturday evening, too late to watch qualifying, but in time to get a lay of the land and to be somewhere in the vicinity of Alain Prost, Keke Rosberg, Niki Lauda, Nigel Mansell, and the like. After we parked near the RenCen and its massive concrete sidewalk barriers, three locals walking by spotted the Wisconsin vanity plate, HMMMM7, on the RX-7. One of them said, presumably having seen the “America’s Dairyland” slogan on the plate, “Ya bring your cow?”

In retrospect, we should have jumped back in the sports car to quickly drive away lest some local assembly line workers carrying tire irons walk by the Japanese two-seater. Remember this was 1982. But we instead tried to find our way into the RenCen. Built by Henry Ford II some five years earlier as a “city within a city” (locals called it “The Deuce’s Last Erection”) the one car we found on-display inside among the European-ish throng of F1 fans was one of the Ford GT40s that ran the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Wouldn’t one of Jim Clark’s Lotus Ford DFVs have been more appropriate?

We couldn’t afford to stay at the RenCen Westin and instead returned to the RX-7 to find it apparently untouched, and drove off to a Holiday Inn near Ann Arbor.

Our $30 seats, cheapest available for the first-ever Detroit Grand Prix, allowed us the largely walled-off view of a first-gear corner at what was then named Cobo Hall (now Huntington Place), where we watched John Watson’s McLaren-Ford (another potential display car) lead a parade of downshifting F1 cars to the win.

Fourteen years later I moved to Detroit to take a staffer job at Autoweek and a year after that, 1997, I moved to a turn-of-the-century warehouse converted to apartments about a mile east of the RenCen. Offices of Crain Communications, which owned AW at the time, weren’t far from the RenCen, so I went there with colleagues once or twice a week for lunch.

The maze inside the seven connected cylinders was as confusing as its walled-off exterior was intimidating. Finding my way to the appropriate corporate office for an interview or press conference held within the structure was not unlike making my way between the U.S. Capitol and the Rayburn House or Dirksen Senate office buildings via their connected basements, as I had for four years prior editing Capitol Hill newsletters.

Wikipedia says Ford sold the RenCen to General Motors in 1996, the year I moved to Detroite, though my faulty memory placed the sale later in the ‘90s. Ford had trouble keeping the complex filled with retail stores and services, and while GM managed to sign a couple of decent restaurants over the years, there were still more than a few vacant storefronts. The RenCen multiplex movie theater closed—and in that part of Detroit there weren’t a lot of screens. The raised People Mover monorail, which has a stop at the RenCen, was never much more of a tourist novelty, except when shuttling fans from parking garages to Red Wings, Tigers or Lions games, or me, some times, to the North American International Auto Show.

My best memories of the place involve attending the Detroit Jazz Festival and Electronic Music Festival held outdoors on the plaza west of the seven cylinders.

Another close friend, Tim Bailey, was an assistant comptroller for the RenCen Intercontinental Hotel in the mid-‘80s. He told me hotel rooms were difficult and expensive to keep warm because of their rounded outer walls. Not exactly beneficial for the hotel’s utility bill.

The good news is after GM’s 2009 bankruptcy, the automaker undertook a renovation on the seven cylinders that included knocking down those exterior concrete barriers. It was no longer a “city within a city,” a fortress you had to drive to, designed to keep out the locals who didn’t have business there (with all the racism that implies). Now it was a place you could walk or bike to, and around. The grand southern entrance faces downtown Windsor, Ontario, and leads to a walkway along the Detroit River.

I’m not sure what more can be done to turn the seven-cylinder fortress into a more welcoming place that can attract tenants who in turn would attract locals and visitors alike, but that’s the plan. GM has announced it will move out of the RenCen in 2025 and into a new office building at the landmark site of the downtown Hudson’s department store, which was imploded in 1999.

GM, along with the Bedrock real estate firm (which almost singlehandedly rebuilt Detroit’s downtown during the last 15 or 20 years) and the city will develop “ideas to remake the seven-building Renaissance Center,” according to The Associated Press. GM is not selling the RenCen and instead plans to return someday — after it is “remade.”

I have to wonder why, or if, GM really will return. The location it is moving to is on a conventional, easily accessible city block and there are probably bike lanes on Woodward Avenue, which it faces, by now. And from the renderings released of the new building, it looks something like a giant fuel-cell stack. Now that’s a future.

And the still-under-construction Hudson’s Tower will be the second-tallest building in Detroit.

Henry Ford II’s structure remains the tallest.

*Todd Lassa is editor-in-chief of The Hustings and contributing editor to Autoweek.

Toyota’s Approach to Environmentally Appropriate Vehicles

By Gary S. Vasilash

There is an on-going criticism of Toyota that it is behind other OEMs when it comes to electric vehicles.

Which is true if the companies in comparison are Ford and GM.

At present, Toyota has one full battery electric vehicle, the bZ4X. It also has one hydrogen-powered electric vehicle—generally referred to as a “fuel cell electric vehicle” or “FCEV”—the Mirai.

At present there are no Lexus electric vehicles, battery or otherwise.

The EPA has recently published “The 2022 EPA Automotive Trends Report.” It examines greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy.

In the report it shows that from 2016 to 2021, the miles per gallon for the aggregate of vehicles produced by the following companies are:

  • Ford:                      22.8 to 22.9 mpg
  • GM:                       22.4 to 21.6 mpg
  • Stellantis:               21.5 to 21.3 mpg

In other words, Ford improved by 0.1 mpg while GM and Stellantis both went in the wrong direction.

Similarly, the CO2 measures are:

  • Ford:                       389 to 385 grams per mile
  • GM:                        397 to 414 grams per mile
  • Stellantis:               413 to 417 grams per mile

In the case of CO2 measures, less is better. Ford got a bit better. The other two didn’t.

Stellantis presently has no full battery electric vehicles. It does have plug-in hybrid (PHEV) versions of the Pacifica, Wrangler and Grand Cherokee.

Ford has battery electrics. The F-150 Lightning, the Mustang Mach-E and the E-Transit. It also has hybrid versions of the Escape, Maverick, F-150, and Explorer. Lincoln offers hybrid versions of the Aviator and the Corsair but no battery electrics.

GM has the Chevrolet Bolt EV and Bolt EUV, Cadillac LYRIQ and HUMMER EV battery electric vehicles at present and no hybrids.

So how does Toyota measure on the EPA metrics?

  • Toyota:                    25.0 to 27.1 mpg

and

  • Toyota:                    355 to 327 grams per mile

Or simply put, in the aggregate, the vehicles that the company put out in the market between 2016 and 2021 are, from an environmental standpoint, better than the vehicles from the other three manufacturers.

And it is worth noting that in 2021 Toyota, with sales of 2.3-million vehicles, was the top manufacturer in the U.S. GM sold 2.2 million, Ford 1.9 million and Stellantis 1.8 million.

It didn’t have the bZ4X last year, so that doesn’t count in its numbers. It did have the Mirai, but the number of those it sells could pretty much fit in the parking lot of a large stadium.

But what it does have are the Prius and Venza and hybrid versions of the Corolla, Camry, Avalon, Sienna, Highlander, Sequoia, RAV4, Tundra, and Lexus ES, UX, NX, RX, LS, and LC.

It could be argued that those vehicles contributed a lot to the “greener” performance of Toyota compared with Ford, GM and Stellantis.

It could also be argued that especially compared with Ford and GM Toyota is some sort of Luddite when it comes to green powertrain technology. . .yet the EPA figures don’t indicate that what it is putting on the road is in any way behind the curve.

On this edition of “Autoline After Hours” we are joined by Jordan Choby, vice president of Powertrain Control at Toyota Motor North America R&D. He joins us from the Toyota Gardena, California campus where fuel cell development is occurring.

Choby explains that, yes, Toyota is working on battery electric vehicles and it plans to have 30% of its global volume be electric vehicles by 2030, but that the company is operating on model that is providing consumer choice regarding the type of engine or motor that is under the hood of their vehicle.

Choby talks with “Autoline’s” John McElory, Tom Murphy of Autoweek, and me.

And you can see the show here.