2025 Mazda CX-5 Turbo Signature

By Gary S. Vasilash

Nomenclature in the auto business is a trickier thing than it ought to be for consumers trying to figure out what it is that they might like to buy.

One example of this is the situation that exists between the Mazda CX-5 and the Mazda CX-50.

The CX-5 is an established moniker, having been around since model year 2013.

The CX-50 is far fresher, having been introduced in model year 2023.

Both are compact SUVs.

The addition of the “0” does indicate that the CX-50 is bigger (e.g., 185.8 inches long vs. 180.1 inches for the CX-5; a 110-inch wheelbase vs. a 106.2-inch wheelbase).

The point is, if you go into a Mazda dealership and are looking for what can be considered the “zippier” of the two, go for the CX-5, especially given that both vehicles come with a 2.5-liter engine that, at the top of the line trims (like the one here), produces 256 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque, so because the CX-5 is slightly smaller, it provides better maneuverability. (Of course, both vehicles are not particularly large in the context of many SUVs/crossovers out there, so this is a relative thing.)

2025 Mazda CX-5: the sort of presence other compact SUVs probably wish they had. (Image: Mazda)

Like all Mazdas—and this is no mean feat—the CX-5 looks great. There has been a consistency in styling for the past few years that Mazda hasn’t deviated from. The exterior sheet metal of the CX-5 is formed in a way that makes it distinctive in a category of vehicles that is becoming increasingly truck-like in appearance. (If people want trucks, don’t they simply buy trucks?)

The cabin is comfortable and the materials are what can be considered a “category-above” compared what are found in other compact crossovers. It is something of a mystery as to how a company that doesn’t sell a whole lot of vehicles vis-à-vis the competitors can have Nappa leather and leather-wrapped steering wheels and shifter, to say nothing of a solid 10-speaker Bose audio system.

The CX-5—as in all trims—is an all-wheel-drive vehicle. In this trim level there is the Mazda Intelligent Drive that allows selection of Normal, Off-Road, Sport. Somehow that central choice doesn’t seem all that relevant for a vehicle that will undoubtedly be driven normally 95% of the time and quickly 5%.

And there is a full suite of the Mazda i-Activsense safety features, including Smart Brake Support (you close too quickly on a vehicle in front of you and the vehicle will let you know it) to Adaptive Front Lighting (which is both cool and functional: when you are turning the headlights appropriately pivot to show you where you are going). When moving through sluggish traffic, there’s Traffic Jam Assist, which uses radar cruise control that can bring the vehicle to a complete stop as well as a steering function that helps keep the vehicle centered.

The EPA Passenger and Cargo volumes are 103.6 cubic feet and 30 cubic feet, respectively, so while not giant in either case, certainly reasonable.

The 2025 CX-5 starts at $29,050 and goes to $41,080 (sans delivery fees).

One option I strongly recommend: the Soul Red Crystal Metallic paint. It shows off the form in a wonderful way.

2025 Mazda MX-5 Miata Grand Touring

A car for serious drivers. After all, given the number who are either distracted or driving vehicles that are massive, attention isn’t optional. . . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

According to NHTSA, in 2023 there were 3,275 people killed in crashes involving distracted drivers. That’s 8% of all fatal crashes. Nine people per day died because of that.

In addition to which, 324,819 were injured in accidents related to distracted driving.

One of the biggest contributors to these accidents is the use of cell phones while driving—despite 31 states having laws that ban the use of hand-held devices while driving and 49 states with laws against texting.

Be that as it may, there are still those who apparently need to be using their devices while piloting an object that weighs, on average, according to the EPA, about 4,330 pounds.

What could go wrong, right?

///

A friend rides a motorcycle for recreation.

I asked him about whether he’s concerned about distracted driving when he’s out.

He replied that (1) when he rides, his helmet is bright with reflectors and that he’s got a high-viz vest; (2) he tends to take his excursions at 7 am on Saturday mornings, when his biggest concern riding on country roads is deer.

Yes, he’s concerned that people won’t see him.

That can be a problem for motorcyclists and drivers of comparatively small vehicles.

///

MX-5: This is the kind of place where you can really enjoy driving it. (Image: Mazda)

When driving the MX-5 I was stopped at a light, first in line.

I glanced in the rearview mirror and saw a portion of a massive chrome grille.

At the top of what I could see through the backlight was part of a Ford logo. Not the whole badge, just part of it.

It was an F-250.

In southeastern Michigan there are probably more F Series trucks, Silverados, Sierras, and Rams than you might imagine. That’s because many people in that part of the country qualify for employee pricing.

Back to the F-250.

Its height of the F-250 4×4 SuperCab is 81.5 inches.

That, of course, is to the roof.

The height of the MX-5 to its roof is 48.8 inches.

The point is, I wondered whether the person who was sitting behind the wheel of the truck could actually see me (yes, the Miata had to be visible because the truck stopped behind it, but the question was whether it was visible after that, for a reason I will get to in a moment).

///

A friend is an excellent driver.

It is something he works at.

During a press drive program for a vehicle there was a gymkhana course set up.

All of the participants took runs on the track. Two or three times.

My friend stayed at it, lap after lap, until he was told it was time to move on.

Once while driving with him in a vehicle with a six-speed manual transmission he stalled it while making a left turn in a downtown intersection.

There we were, momentarily stopped amidst plenty of traffic.

He quickly got it restarted and engaged first in an instant so we pulled way.

I thought about that situation when I was stopped at the light with the truck behind me and a manual shift knob grasped in my right hand.

///

According to MotorTrend, these are all the vehicles currently available with a manual transmission:

  • 2025 Acura Integra and Integra Type S
  • 2025 BMW M2
  • 2025 BMW M3 and M4
  • 2025 BMW Z4
  • 2025 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing
  • 2025 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing
  • 2025 Ford Bronco
  • 2025 Ford Mustang
  • 2025 Honda Civic Si and Type R
  • 2025 Hyundai Elantra N
  • 2025 Jeep Wrangler
  • 2025 Lotus Emira
  • 2025 Mazda 3 Hatchback
  • 2025 Mazda Miata
  • 2025 Nissan Z
  • 2025 Porsche 718 Boxster and Cayman
  • 2025 Porsche 911
  • 2025 Subaru BRZ
  • 2025 Subaru WRX
  • 2025 Toyota GR86
  • 2025 Toyota GR Corolla
  • 2025 Toyota Tacoma
  • 2025 Toyota GR Supra
  • 2025 Volkswagen Jetta GLI

What do they all have in common?

None of them are particularly big sellers.

The point is, many drivers probably don’t know there are manual transmissions. And that sometimes people driving them can stall at a light.

After all, they think, you just take your foot off the brake, move it to the accelerator, and go.

And if you have your phone in your hand. . . .

///

One benefit of driving a car like the Miata is that you are fully engaged in driving it.

You don’t have your phone in your hand because you need your hands to do the activity of driving the vehicle.

///

In 2024 Ford delivered 765,649 F Series trucks.

In 2024 Mazda delivered 8,103 MX-5s.

The point is, there are a lot of large vehicles on the road.

There aren’t so many small ones.

///

The Miata is small. 154.1 inches long and a 90.9-inch wheelbase. 68.3 inches wide and 48.8 inches high.

It snugly seats two. It has 4.6 cubic feet of cargo volume, meaning you’re not going to use this vehicle to help anyone move.

///

But it is lithe.

It has a 181-hp four-cylinder engine. Weight distribution, depending on trim, is either 53:47 or 51:49. Either way, exceedingly balanced. And on the subject of weight, it is light, 2,469 pounds, which means the engine doesn’t have a whole lot of mass to move.

Fuel economy is 26 city/34 highway/29 mpg combined. Not great for such a small car.

///

Here’s the point:

A Miata, especially one with a six-speed manual (a six-speed automatic), is a car for a serious driver who wants the car for driving—and not driving in urban environments where there is a lot of stop-and-go driving by people who are annoyed by all of the stop-and-go and so want to get on their way.

It is a car for someone who is going to be attuned to the environment and attentive to others while driving.

Check those boxes and you’re good to go.

Otherwise, probably not.

2025 Mazda3 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus

Where function meets fun. . . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

Mazda has long had a reputation for superb ride-and-handling performance at an affordable price.

I think in some regards this reputation—well earned—doesn’t necessarily translate into the array of crossovers it has on the market, despite many reviewers giving those vehicles high marks for those characteristics: It is something of a reputation-based belief (i.e., if Mazdas in the past were X, then Mazdas of today are X, too).

The thing is: This doesn’t give credit where credit is due.

And the Mazda3 deserves a whole lot of credit. (Some of the crossovers: not so much. Sorry.)

This is the car—and yes, it is a car, and in this case, a hatchback (!)*—that not only has the litheness, maneuverability, and performance that are associated with Mazda. And, yes, there is the issue of affordability, too.

That is, this Turbo Premium Plus model, with AWD, the top-of-the-line model in the lineup, has an MSRP of $37,150—or some $10,000 less than the average transaction price (ATP) for vehicles out there.

Mazda3: This is a car that has all of that Mazda goodness you’ve heard about. (Image: Mazda)

Of course, the ATP covers vehicles of all configurations and sizes, and while, according to the EPA classification, the Mazda3 is a midsize car, it is on the compact side. (That is, it is 175.6 inches long, 70.7 inches high, 56.7 inches wide, and has a 107.3-inch wheelbase.)

The EPA calculates the categories based on interior volume, with midsize vehicles having from 110 to 119.9 cubic feet of space. The Mazda3 hatch has 92.7 cubic feet of passenger volume and 20.1 cubic feet of cargo volume with the rear seat up, so it comes in at 112.8 cubic feet.

(The 2025 Bentley Flying Spur is also in the EPA midsize category, which just goes to show you that one man’s categorized vehicle is another man’s absurdity.)

The thing is, the Premium Plus package puts things on the outside, like a rear spoiler and front air dam. Yes, the car is quick, but those probably are more trim than hard-working aero elements.

On the inside there are things like leather seats and a solid Bose audio system. The Premium Plus package also increases the size of the infotainment screen on board to 10.25 inches.

The car has a 2.5-liter turbocharged engine.

If you go to the gas station and fill the tank with regular, it produces 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque

If you opt to spend a few bucks more at the pump and go for 93 octane, then it is 250 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque.

There is a six-speed automatic. Suspension-wise, it is MacPherson strut with stabilizer bar in the front and a torsion beam in the back.

There is also a feature called “SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS:  G-Vectoring Control Plus.” It is as seamlessly tricky as its name is complicated. Essentially, it makes various adjustments—such as to the torque of the engine and the braking of specific wheels—when cornering or simply making lane changes.

This greatly contributes to the aforementioned reputation for ride and handling.

The Mazda3 has it.

Given the performance of the engine and the engineered ride and handling, the Mazda3 is the kind of vehicle that you can drive to work, plodding along with all of the others who are in the same jam you are, but then get a chance to make a quick maneuver that gets you another spot a bit further along.

It is the kind of vehicle that you can take to Costco and load up with Costco-sized products.

It is the kind of vehicle that you can drive on the weekends on a parkway and have fun while you’re going to the place in the park where you’re going to have some out-of-car fun.

It is one of the most enjoyable cars I’ve driven in some time.

//

*As there is the increasing transition to crossovers from cars, here’s hoping that Mazda keeps the Mazda3 in its lineup. It has long offered hatchback and sedan body styles for the Mazda3, again something that I hope continues long into the future.

2025 Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Carbon Turbo

It isn’t often you can find a vehicle of this type that is (1) affordable and (2) actually fun to drive.

By Gary S. Vasilash

In 2024 Mazda North American Operations reported “record-breaking” sales. It sold 424,382 vehicles.

Of that total, 46,980 were cars. The remainder, 377,402 were crossovers.

The cars consisted mainly (as in 38,877) in the form of Mazda3s. The MX-5 Miata made up the balance in the car calculations.

But look at all of the crossovers.

The point is, Mazda has made a concerted shift away from the cars. Many driving enthusiasts who knew they needed to buy cars mainly for purposes of daily transportation would often opt for a Mazda because (1) it had sporty driving dynamics, (2) it was affordable and (3) it would do what needed to be done in terms of simply getting you to work or school in an appealing package.

Years ago at a press conference where an SUV was being introduced a writer for one of the buff books asked a company exec, “I get the utility part, but what about the sport?”

That must have been 20 years ago.

And in that time, while there has been an explosion of SUVs (or some would say “CUVs,” because most of them are based on car platforms so they are considered “crossovers,” but what isn’t taken into account is that many SUVs are based on truck platforms, so aren’t they crossovers, too?), the levels of stylistic sportiness, either in terms of the exterior sheet metal or the powertrain and chassis combination have been lacking.

Even the utility isn’t what one might think. People interested in carrying people and goods would be better off getting a minivan.

Mazda CX-30. You can carry things. And enjoy the driving experience while doing so. (Image: Mazda)

The Mazda CX-30 is sporty and it is comparatively affordable, with the trim driven here having an MSRP of $32,940, which is well under the average transaction price for a vehicle nowadays such that even though it is a bit so-so on the miles per gallon front—22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, combined 25 mpg—you’d have cash left over for filling the tank quite readily, even if you opt to fill it with premium. Why would you do that? Because on premium the turbo-charged four produces 250 hp. On regular gas the output is 227 hp. So sportier is simply a bit more expensive.

The engine is mated to a six-speed automatic. There are paddles should you desire to shift-it-yourself, of course.

The vehicle features Mazda’s i-Activ AWD system, which monitors where the torque needs to go, and G-Vectoring Control Plus, which both adjusts torque and braking when cornering.

Chassis-wise, the front suspension is MacPherson strut with a stabilizer bar and in the rear a torsion-beam setup.

All of which goes to the point of this being sporty.

There is utility, too, given the configuration of the vehicle, offering 20.2 cubic feet with the rear seat in place (per EPA) and 45.2 cubic feet with the seat back folded (per SAE).

Given this is the S Carbon Turbo trim, there is an appropriate use of fitting materials, such as terracotta leatherette/suede seat coverings, as well as a suede material on the IP. The IP has a 10.25-inch infotainment touchscreen. There are, of course, wireless CarPlay and Android Auto, and even Alexa.

The bottom line: this is sport. And utility.

2025 Mazda CX-90 S Premium Plus

In which we wonder a bit about engine nomenclature. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

As everyone doesn’t know, a Newton is the force required to accelerate a one-kilogram object one meter per second second. So a Newton meter is essentially the measurement of a forward push.

Another way of looking at it (which is similarly less helpful for understanding because unless you have a master’s degree. . .in Science! you are likely not to get this, either) is that a Newton-meter is the unit of torque in the International System of Units (SI).

In this part of the world, where we don’t much cotton to things of an international nature, we use foot-pounds instead when it comes to torque.

One Newton-meter is equal to 0.73756215 pound-force-feet.

Got that?

In March 2019, when internal combustion was still the thing and people weren’t concerned about kWh and the like, Cadillac, undoubtedly wanting to get its international bona fides in order, decided on a new nomenclature system for its vehicles predicated on torque figures in Newton-meters. But because some of those numbers can be somewhat awkward, a decision was made to round up to the nearest 50 so there would be a nice round number used on the exterior badging.

Guess it is hard to come up with things to name the various vehicles in your showrooms.

Generally speaking, there has been the use of engine names on vehicles with varying levels of success over the years. Ford using “EcoBoost” had its moment. GM’s “Ecotec” didn’t have much in the way of resonance.

The all-time champ, one that can still achieve knowing nods, is the Dodge HEMI.

Someone can have absolutely no idea of what a horsepower is, to say nothing of a Newton-meter, and still know that the HEMI badge means bad-ass performance.

Which is a roundabout way of getting to the Mazda CX-90 S Premium Plus, a three-row SUV built on Mazda’s electrified Large Platform.

And if you think “Mazda” and something diminutive like the Miata (officially known as the MX-5), then the CX-90 may come as something of a surprise because it is nothing if not sizable: 122.8-inch wheelbase; 200.8 inches long; 78.5 inches wide; 68.2 inches high.

It provides 57 cubic feet of space for those in the front row; 51 cubic feet for those in the middle; 35 cubic feet for those in the rear (OK, a bit tight, but. . .).

And in terms of cargo capacity, there is 75 cubic feet with the second and third rows folded and 16 cubic feet if the seat backs are vertical.

But you’re wondering what all of that engine stuff at the start of this piece has to do with this vehicle. . . .

It’s this: For some reason known probably only to the marketing team, on the front quarter panel of the CX-90 there is a black and chrome badge that reads: “INLINE 6.”

That’s what’s under the hood. Does it matter? (Images: Mazda)

That’s right: the vehicle has a 3.3-liter, turbocharged, inline six-cylinder engine. Perhaps this is to differentiate the Mazda from something like a Chevy Traverse, which has an INLINE 4. (Though it doesn’t indicate that.)

From a performance point of view, the Mazda powertrain produces 340 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque (or, for those of you who are now SI mavens, 500 Nm, which is a fairly impressive number on its own, so maybe that would be a good moniker: CX-90 500).

The use of the word “powertrain” rather than “engine” is deliberate, for you may still recall the word “electrified” above.

The vehicle is fitted with what is called the “M-Hybrid Boost.” This is a 48-volt mild hybrid system, which means that it serves as a, well, boost, especially at starting from low speeds. It also helps with the overall efficiency, which is what I noticed in driving, as the low-speed boost was “meh,” but getting a combined 27 mpg for a vehicle weighing some 4,900 pounds with three rows and all-wheel drive is certainly satisfying.

Somehow I think it would have been cooler, if no more meaningful, to have “M-Hybrid Boost” on an exterior badge rather than INLINE 6. At least it would seem more future-oriented if no more clear to consumers.

Because the CX-90 is the top-of-the-line, the interior is well appointed with Nappa leather, streamline-design metal trim pieces, and a large piece of fabric on the IP with intricate stitching which appears as though it has more to do with high-fashion than Newton-meters.

That large surface is covered with an intricately stitched fabric.

All, in, however, this model is an interesting alternative to the vehicles in this category that have been available for a longer period of time, especially as Mazda seems to be making a serious effort to get its foot in the proverbial door in the three-row SUV space so it is over indexing.

To the benefit of the buyer.

2025 Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Carbon Edition

Don’t just consider the top-of-mind when thinking “compact crossover”. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

During a recent “Autoline After Hours” co-host John McElroy, talking about a Mazda CX-90 he was driving, said, “I don’t know why more people don’t buy Mazdas.”

Which is a solid observation.

First, however, it should be noted that Mazda’s fortunes in the U.S. market considerably improved in 2024 compared with 2023.

In ’24 it sold 424,382 vehicles. The previous year it was just 363,354. That’s nearly a 17% improvement.

Compare that with the overall U.S. market being up a mere 2.2% and you can see that Mazda’s bump is impressive.

But then there is what Mazda is up against.

In 2024 Ford sold 124,701 Bronco Sports, 146,859 Escapes and 194,094 Explorers, for a total of 450,125 vehicles.

Of course, Mazda has about 550 dealerships in the U.S. and Ford 3,000, so there is something to be said for access and availability.

The 2024 sales for the CX-5 were 134,088 vehicles. That is a drop of 12.8% compared with 2023 sales.

Mazda CX-5: Ripe for consideration. (Image: Mazda)

However, one might argue that the Mazda CX-50, another compact SUV that is approximately the same size as the CX-5 but which has a bit more of a rugged execution (sort of like the Bronco Sport and the Ford Escape, but (a) the Bronco Sport is far more rugged overall than the Escape and (b) the two Mazdas are on different platforms, so there is that difference). CX-50 sales in 2024, at 81,441, were up 82.6%.

Of course, someone looking at a new vehicle is looking now, not last year, so. . . .

The comparison with the Ford Escape isn’t coincidental. The vehicles are quite similar with a few notable differences.

For example, the CX-5 comes standard with all-wheel-drive. The Escape has that as an option.

The engine in a CX-5 is a 2.5-liter four that produces 187 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque. The base engine in the Escape is a 1.5-liter in-line three cylinder engine that produces 180 hp and 199 lb-ft of torque.

The Ford has an eight-speed automatic. It is six for the Mazda.

For those who are interested in cargo capacity the Escape clearly has the advantage with 37.5 cubic feet versus 30.8 cubic feet for the CX-5.

But to get back to McElroy’s original question, it goes to the point of why there are probably far more people who had a default thought to an Escape (or an Equinox or RAV4 or CR-V) and not the CX-5: good as they are, Mazdas are largely invisible in the market.

With a base MSRP of $32,600 the 2.5 S Carbon Edition brings such things as leather seating and a power moonroof; a 10.25-inch center display and wireless charging, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

It is competent and contemporary.  And because of that, the CX-5 needs to be considered.

2025 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid Premium Plus

A Mazda built in a somewhat unexpected place. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

Madison, Alabama, is a city southwest of Huntsville, about 12 miles away, a quick trip on the I-565. It has a population of some 60,854, a nice bump up from the 56,933 in 2020.

The median household income in Madison is $118,132, compared with the national average of $75,149. Sixty-four percent of the population has a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared with the national average of 34%.

Madison, Alabama, is a place you’ve not heard of, as there are about 200 cities in the U.S. with a population of about 60,000.

But there’s something else about Madison that you may not be aware of:

It is the home of Mazda Toyota Manufacturing, a $2.3-billion factory where some 4,000 people work at producing 300,000 vehicle per year.

The first vehicle produced in the plant was the 2022 Toyota Corolla Cross. Assembly commenced in September 2021. A few months later, the Mazda CX-50 build began.

(Fun fact: Huntsville is the home of the legendary Marshall Space Flight Center. There are two assembly lines in the MTM plant: Apollo and Discovery.)

Timing is everything, so it seems rather propitious for Mazda that it decided to put a hybrid under the hood of the CX-50.

Mazda CX-50 compact crossover with a hybrid powertrain. (Image: Mazda)

And it would hard to believe that it is just a coincidence that the hybrid system—which includes a 176-hp 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine supplemented by three AC motors, so that there is a total system output of 219 hp—is one that is spec-wise just like the hybrid in the Toyota RAV-4.

(Curiously, the Corolla Cross is available as a hybrid, too, yet its system is different than the one that is used in the CX-50. The RAV-4 is built in the Toyota plant in Georgetown, Kentucky. Although one might think that it would be closer to go from Apollo to Discovery (or vice versa), turns out the hybrid system isn’t sourced from Kentucky but is sourced from Japan.)

It has a continuously variable transmission. It is all-wheel drive.

The vehicle is stickered at 39 mpg city, 37 mpg highway and 38 mpg combined.

Style

From the standpoint of the exterior, the compact crossover has the Mazda sheet metal styling that shows skill in creasing sheet metal, but perhaps because Mazda has been using this approach for a while on its range of vehicles, it isn’t as visually striking as it once was. Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage have become more visually striking and so the Mazda doesn’t have the standout looks it once had.

On the inside, especially as this is the top-of-the-line Premium Plus trim, there are things like leather for the seats and steering wheel. The instrumentation is laid out in a stylish and useful manner. There is a 10.25-inch display that is controlled by a large horizontally oriented knob in the center console. I would strongly recommend that if you’re interested in this vehicle and take it out for a test drive that you test drive that setup because some find it to be somewhat unwieldy.

Size

The CX-50 has a 110.8-inch wheelbase. It is 186.1 inches long, 75.6 inches wide and 65.8 inches wide.

So far as cargo: fold the second row and get 56 cubic feet. Behind the second row there are 29 cubic feet. As that is probably hard to visualize, simply know that there is plenty of room back there without folding the seats.

Assessment

The people in Mazda marketing probably cringe when people bring up the old “Zoom-Zoom” line.

If you’re interested in that, this isn’t the place to find it.

But if you want to get an efficient compact crossover, this is something that should be considered.

2024 Mazda3 2.5T Premium Plus Sedan AWD

By Gary S. Vasilash

Here’s something interesting: the model year 2004 Mazda3 was the first of the first generation of Mazda’s compact car, which means the one considered here is what has occurred to it 20 years later.

Interestingly, there was a four-cylinder engine, as there is now, but whereas the 2.3-liter four in the early Mazda3 produced 160 hp, the turbocharged 2.5-liter engine in today’s model produces 250 hp running premium fuel or 227 hp should one opt for regular. (In the early models, the base engine was a 2.0-liter that produced 148 hp; the base engine for the ’24 models is the naturally aspirated 2.5-liter that produces 191 hp—regardless of octane (well, it at least has to be 87 octane)).

Mazda3: a compact car that’s competent but comparatively pricy. (Image: Mazda)

But bringing it just back to now, know that the Mazda3 2.5 Turbo (there is also a Carbon Turbo) is equipped with a six-speed automatic. (There is a six-speed manual for the other trims. And of that manual, one can only think: For now.*)

The Premium Plus trim is the top-of-the-line.

As such it has some exterior design differences from other models in the lineup. Mazda designers have consistently done superlative work over the past several years.

The front end of the Mazda3 has an appearance that is stylish, sophisticated and sporty, a trifecta that is difficult to pull off.

However when you get to the C-pillar and back things are not quite as good, which is predicated on the fact that it is difficult to style a compact sedan in a way that looks proportionate throughout, especially as there is a need to keep the roofline somewhat high in order to give people who sit in the rear some headroom.

Hatchbacks, like the Mazda3 hatch, lend themselves to a more cohesive design—which leads to a market curiosity: Hatches simply aren’t particularly popular.

(What is odd about that is “utility” vehicles are wildly popular.

And hatchbacks generally provide more utility, at least vis-à-vis cargo capacity.

In the case of the Mazda3, the sedan has EPA cargo volume of 13.2 cubic feet and the Mazda3 hatch has 20.1 cubic feet of capacity.

And while it might be assumed the increase in cargo capacity for the hatch is based on reducing passenger volume, the difference in passenger volume is a reduction of 0.1 cubic feet for the hatch, 92.7 cubic feet compared with 92.8 cubic feet.)

To resume.

The Mazda3 sedan is 183.5 inches long, 70.7 inches wide, and 56.9 inches high. It has a 107.3-inch wheelbase. Which is approximately the same size of other vehicles in its class (e.g., Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic).

The Premium Plus trim includes features like paddle shifters; keyless entry; wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay; a 12-speaker Bose audio system; 10.25-inch color center display; radar cruise control with stop and go capability; lane departure warning and lane keep assist; and more.

An issue with the Mazda3 Premium Plus is pricing. It starts at $35,800. The somewhat comparable top-of-the-line ’24 Civic Touring starts at $30,550. But it doesn’t have AWD. And the somewhat comparable Toyota Corolla Hybrid Nightshade AWD starts at $28,340. But as its name indicates, it is a hybrid.

In fact, the starting price for a ’24 Camry SE Nightshade AWD—not a hybrid—starts at $5,540 less than the Mazda3.

Mazda needs to work on its pricing.

*What is sad is that there is only one other car in the current Mazda lineup, the MX-5 Miata, with a manual gearbox. Through the first half of 2024 there were 4,004 MX-5s sold. Say you’re a Mazda exec in Hiroshima HQ and you see that number and note that with the exception of the just-released CX-70, the worst-selling Mazda crossover during the first half was the top-of-the-line CX-90, which had sales of 22,959 units—or 1,128 more than all of the cars (well, there are just the Mazda3 and MX-5) combined (21,831). Somehow that 4,004 doesn’t look all that worthwhile for the engineering and testing necessary for a manual.

2025 Mazda CX-70 Turbo S Premium Plus

A midsize SUV with something of a rational but curious difference. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2023 the mean family size in the average household was 3.15 members. While it is not clear what constitutes the other 0.85, it is clear that there are fewer than four whole family members.

And according to the 2022 American Community Survey, conducted by the Census Bureau, in 2022 68.7 workers aged 16 and above drove to work alone, which is an increase over 2021’s 67.8%, but well below 2019’s 75.9%.

One more data point: while this is constantly changing, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in August 2023, 19.5% of workers worked from home. Presumably that had an effect on the number of people who drove to work alone.

Mazda CX-70. Long enough for three, but with just two rows. (Image: Mazda)

All of this is to perhaps provide a rationalization for the interior configuration of the Mazda CX-70, a large-ish midsize SUV: 200.8 inches long, 78.5 inches wide, 68.2 inches high; as a reference, the Ford Explorer is 198.7 inches long, 78.9 inches wide and 69.6 inches high.

You look at those numbers and figure that we’re talking about the same proverbial ballpark in terms of size. And you’re right.

But what’s different about the CX-70 compared to the Explorer and many other SUVs in this large-ish midsize segment is that it has two rows of seats, not three.

Given all of the data about the number of people and vehicle use, seating for five is probably pretty much all one would need on a regular basis. Or an irregular basis there is that need for a third row, a space that is generally not particularly accommodating, especially for those who have moved on from elementary school.

Still, there is a tendency to opt for the “just in case,” so plenty of people buy three-row SUVs, even if that third row is always folded flat.

And Mazda offers the CX-90, which is the dimensional twin of the CX-70, though with the third row.

This additional complexity in the lineup is curious. As is the fact that when I visited the Mazda shopping site, the starting MSRP for a 2024 CX-90 was $37,845 and for a 2025 CX-70 $40,445, and while there are undoubtedly some content differences, it seems, well, odd.

But in terms of passenger roominess it is worth noting that the two vehicles have the same passenger volume: 141.6 cubic feet, which goes to the point of the third row inhabitants not being particularly happy.

Back to the vehicle at hand.

Like all the CX-70 trims, it is AWD.

It is powered by a 3.3-liter, turbocharged in-line six cylinder engine that produces 340 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque (with premium fuel). There is an eight-speed automatic transmission.

While Mazda has been known for the past few years of providing exterior designs for its lineup of vehicles that put it in a very small category of OEMs that are consistently innovating, the CX-70’s exterior design is certainly handsome, but it is not as distinctive as Mazdas have been.

It seems as though for the CX-70 they decided they’d put the focus on the interior design. In this Premium Plus package there are the 12.3-inch Mazda Connect center infotainment display, seven-inch TFT LCD instrument panel display, head-up display, Bose 12-speaker audio, Mazda Online Navigation with over-the-air update capability, wireless phone charging, keyless entry, and more.

What is surprising is not the Nappa leather for the seats or the two-tone leather-wrapped steering wheel. But the fact that there are suede inserts on the dash.

There is a wide range of driver assistance tech, ranging from traffic sign recognition to cruise control with stop-and-go capability.

Fitted with “Mazda Genuine Towing Accessories” it can tow up to 5,000 pounds.

The starting MSRP for the vehicle is $55,950.

While that is certainly understandable given what is listed on the sticker and in the general overall performance of the vehicle (though I did experience some turbo lag on occasion), what will probably make it difficult for people to opt for it is that seat delete.

There’s Something About Mazda Design

By Gary S. Vasilash

Several years ago I met Derek Jenkins, who was heading up Design at Mazda North America.

Then Derek introduced me to one of his colleagues on the team, Julien Montousse.

Both of those guys were doing extraordinary work. Although Mazda sales numbers are low when you put them into context of most other marques, arguably if the vehicles lacked the superb execution of design—inside and out—that they exhibit (and have had for the past several years), then those numbers would likely be microscopic and business-wise it would be catastrophic.

Jenkins moved on to Lucid, where he is leading the design efforts. The Lucid Air is both extraordinary and exquisite from the styling perspective. Simply an amazing vehicle and would be even if it didn’t have its propulsion system.

Montousse moved on, as well, but in his case to Archer Aviation, the company that is creating electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, which Archer plans to have its aircraft in commercial service by 2025.

The Archer Midnight. No, not a car. (Image: Archer Aviation)

Montousse and colleagues just won a MUSE Design Award for the Archer Midnight eVTOL.

Montousse: “After spending most of my life designing cars, I saw from a distance that technology breakthroughs were happening in aerospace and that they would unlock new aircraft architectures. When developing a product in a completely new space like eVTOL aircraft, it’s important to instill confidence and earn the trust of consumers.”

Then, sounding much like a car guy, he went on: “When setting out to design Midnight, we focused on creating a powerful aircraft design that forged an emotional connection between passenger and aircraft. Midnight combines high function with high emotion delivering a travel experience unlike any other.”

Swap out some of those nouns with automotive terms.

Seems like there must be something in the water at Mazda for two extraordinary talents to have come from there.