Author Archives: shinymetalboxes

Advancing Air Mobility

Posted on by

Toyota’s efforts in transportation go far beyond building Camrys. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

“Air mobility has the potential to change our ‘sense of distance and time,’ and open a future with the new option of air mobility that will further enrich the lives of many people.”

You can imagine someone who is in the business of making things like electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) air taxis saying something like that.

But that was said by Hiroki Nakajima, executive vice president and chief technology officer of Toyota Motor Corporation.

Toyota is working with Joby Aviation on the development and production of eVTOL air taxis. (Image: Joby)

That’s right: an exec at a company that is best known for building things that travel on the surface of the earth promoting getting from point A to B in the sky via eVTOLs.

Nakajima made the statement earlier this week when an electric aircraft built by Joby Aviation, a company founded in 2009 and based in California, made Joby’s first international exhibition flight at the Toyota Higashi-Fuji Technical Center in Shizuoka, Japan.

One could argue that Toyota is in the business of making things like electric air taxis because it has invested $894-million in Joby; it has Toyota personnel working along side those who work for Joby in a facility in California; and it has signed an agreement through which it will be supplying powertrain and actuation components to Joby for the build of the aircraft.

Although one of the business cases that is being made for these electric air taxis is transporting people from places like the Downtown Manhattan Heliport to LaGuardia or JFK, there are also opportunities for using the aircraft in rural areas. Think, for example, of emergency transport of people who are in places where the terrain means the roads have twists and turns, adding to additional transport time vs. flying in from point A to B and back.

Another example of why the future of transportation is multimodal.

2025 Infiniti QX60 Luxe AWD

Posted on by

Perhaps the Majestic White would be a better look. . .


By Gary S. Vasilash


When you have a vehicle that has “Luxe” in its name you figure that it must be, well, luxurious. But one thing about the QX60 Luxe as driven here is that it has the “Black Edition Package,” a $1,900 option that provides gloss-black 20-inch wheels, gloss black roof rails, black grille, and black headliner on the inside. And the Black Edition Package makes it possible to select from three premium paints: Mineral Black, Majestic White, or a newly developed color, Harbor Gray.


The first two rows of the three-row SUV have leather, which also happened to be black. (The front seats are the comfortable “Zero Gravity” style that Nissan had initially launched in the 2013 Altima and which have been improved since; the second-row seats (and know that the outboard seating positions back there are heated, while the front seats are heated and ventilated).)


But the thing is, the whole execution seemed less luxe to me and more like I was living in Wednesday Addams’ world.


The QX60 is powered by a turbocharged 2.0-liter I4 that produces 268 hp @ 5,600 rpm and 286 lb-ft of torque at 4,400 rpm. It is mated to a nine-speed automatic.


The vehicle weighs 4,696 pounds.

2025 Infiniti QX60 Luxe Black Edition. (Image: Infiniti)


And it really seemed that in some cases when I planted the accelerator (e.g., coming off a freeway ramp into the speeding traffic) I would have been happy with, say, a couple more cylinders. (To be fair, however, it should be noted that a competitive vehicle, like the Lincoln Nautilus (though it has two rows, not three), also has a turbocharged I4. While it has 250 hp, the vehicle is lighter, so it turns out that a power-to-weight ratio is essentially a wash. The point being that this is something that is characteristic of the vehicle type, it seems.)
It should be noted that the fuel economy numbers are 22 mpg city, 27 highway, and 24 combined, so there is something to be said for not having two extra cylinders.


It checks the boxes with a sizeable touch screen (12.3 inch) and an array of standard safety tech (forward emergency braking with pedestrian detection, predictive forward collision warning, rear cross-traffic alert, rear automatic braking, blind spot warning, lane departure warning11 and high beam assist). There are also things like traffic sign recognition, intelligent cruise control with stop-and-go, and other features and functions.


New to the 2025 QX60 is a key fob that is recognized by the vehicle such that when you approach the vehicle with said fob there is a beep from the SUV announcing that the door is unlocked. When you turn off the SUV and exit, once you’re a few feet away the vehicle beeps and the doors lock. Clever, but I was a bit concerned when I happened to be repeatedly walking by the SUV with the fob in my pocket. I was afraid that the repeated beeps and locking-unlocking would cause the processor to throw an electronic gasket.


That didn’t happen.


Convenience really matters when you actually need a three-row vehicle (i.e., you have your hands full—figuratively and often literally). Which is probably why there is that fob arrangement.


Credit to the Infiniti folks to be thinking of things like that.

2025 Lexus UX300h F Sport Handling

Posted on by

Lexus brings a small hybrid. But the styling could use some help. . .?

By Gary S. Vasilash

The good news about the Lexus UX300h F Sport is that it is a hybrid. And not just any hybrid system but the fifth-generation Lexus Hybrid System. Which doesn’t necessarily mean all that much at first. I mean, does anyone remember the second- or third-generation Lexus Hybrid System?

I didn’t think so.

But what this does mean is that the UX300h has a system that has been refined multiple times, more times than probably any competitive hybrid vehicle out there.

As for what that system consists of: it is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that is supplemented by two motor generators via a planetary-type continuously variable transmission. There are front and rear motors and a 60-cell lithium-ion battery.

All of which means that there is a total horsepower of 196.

And a combined fuel economy of 43 mpg.

Which is a nice thing to have.

The thing to know about the hybrid system in this vehicle is probably this: you can simply ignore it. It just works. There is nothing that makes you think, “Hmm. . .I wonder what’s going on in there?”

In a word: seamless.

Lexus UX300h. The plus is that it is a hybrid. The minus is in that styling. (Image: Lexus)

The model driven here features the F Sport Handling package. Which means there is active variable suspension from a mechanical standpoint and an aluminum pedals and sport seats (among other things) from an aesthetic and functional perspective.

Regardless of the active variable suspension—as well as active cornering assist—the UX300h is not exactly the sort of thing you’re going to take to the local gymkhana and crush it.

Lexus says there is “the higher seating position and versatility experienced in a crossover.”

I suppose there is a higher seating position compared with, say, a Lexus RC, but while this is supposed to be a “crossover,” it is a diminutive one (176.97 inches long, 72.49 inches wide, 60.63 inches high, and a 103.94-inch wheelbase) and with a 6.3-inch ground clearance, this isn’t exactly something you’ll wonder about a running board for ingress and egress.

There is a 12.3-inch color touchscreen. There is the Lexus Safety System+ 3.0, which includes various collision prevention/mitigation technologies as well as driving enhancements.

The tech isn’t overwhelming in the UX.

But then there is the styling.

And this is something that I think is not only underwhelming for a Lexus, but underwhelming, period.

The cladding around the wheels doesn’t make the vehicle look robust. The creases in the body side unnecessarily break up the surface (i.e., this is a small vehicle, so it’s not like there is a giant slab that would require some sort of visual relief).

About the only thing it has going for it is the spindle grille, and that’s something that many people find to be off-putting.

The base UX300h MSRP is $36,340.

The one driven here has base MSRP of $47,647.

And that’s a problem, I think.

One could select the top-of-the-line Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and get a bigger, more powerful vehicle with a slightly smaller touchscreen (10.5 inches) and a bit less in the way of fuel economy (40 mpg combined)—and have a base price of $40,205 for the loaded-trim.

“But it’s not a Lexus.”

Yes.

Still. . . .

OEMs Chasing the Well-Heeled

Posted on by

Higher margins matter. For now. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

One of the issues that consumers face in the new-car market in the U.S. is the non-trivial sticker price. According to Kelley Blue Book, the average transaction price for a new vehicle was $48,397 in September.

Charlie Chesbrough, Cox Automotive Senior Economist, said of the number, “One reason transaction prices are lower in 2024 is that many buyers are choosing smaller, less expensive vehicles. The subcompact and compact SUV segments are outperforming the market this year, and by no coincidence, they’re also two of the lowest-priced product segments in the market.”

Two points about that:

  1. It is surprising to think that prices are “lower in 2024” when that number is above $48K.
  2. Subcompact and compact SUVs are growing in popularity, but it seems the likes of GM and Ford are still more interested in the other end of the spectrum, which helps with their earnings now, but perhaps not for the long run, when people simply can no longer accept high monthly payments. (Given the number of large, expensive vehicles that are still being sold, it is clear many people continue to be accepting. But at some point other bills are going to take precedence. After all, when the average monthly car payment is on the order of $750, and the Bureau of Labor Statics found that car insurance premiums increased an average 20% between June 2023 and June 2024, something’s got to give.)

This phenomenon of going for the upper end of the market is not just one in the U.S.

Renault Rafale E-Tech 4×4 with the Atelier Alpine features a chassis and agility control system developed by the engineers of Alpine Cars. There is a self-adjusting ting smart suspension with a camera for predictive control. (Photo Clément Choulot / DPPI)

Renault just introduced a new plug-in hybrid crossover, the Rafale E-Tech 4×4. It is a 300-hp vehicle that has a 22-kWh battery that the company says can power the car some 105 km (65 miles) on the European WLTP schedule (which is different than the EPA).

What did Bruno Vanel, VP, Renault Brand, Product, Revenue & International Markets Expansion, say of the new vehicle represents? It “symbolizes our move upmarket and our legitimacy to conquer all customers with a high-performance version.”

When you think of European vehicles that are (1) upmarket and (2) high performance, odds are something from BMW comes to mind. And this is probably the case in France, as well.

But Renault wants some of those higher margins, too.

The Mixed Signals on Robotaxis

Posted on by

Those who have been in them like them, but then there is consumer readiness, which isn’t much. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

Although Waymo vehicles are transporting people in places like San Francisco and Phoenix with vehicles that are without a driver in command and while Tesla showed off its steering wheel- and pedals-free Cybercab, presumably for any of these to be commercially viable (i.e., allow the operators to make money), then there has to be a significant number of people taking advantage of the autonomous rides.

The J.D. Power 2024 Robotaxi Experience Study showed that those who have taken a ride in a self-driving vehicle feel good about the experience: 76% are confident in the vehicles after they’ve been in one compared with 20% who haven’t had the experience feeling confident about them.

However, another study—the J.D. Power 2024 U.S. Mobility Confidence Index Study, shows that on a 100-point scale, the score for “consumer automated vehicle readiness” is at 39. That’s two points better than in 2023, but it is where it had been in 2022.

One of the interesting findings this study goes to the point of insurance. While 71% of consumers say they don’t expect to acquire insurance on a pay-per-ride basis when using a robotaxi (did you ever think about acquiring insurance when getting in an Uber or on a bus?), 57% say they expect the vehicle owner to have liability coverage for the self-driving vehicle.

And while the Cybercab is designed without a steering wheel or pedals, 86% of the people surveyed by J.D. Power say they want the ability to take control of the vehicle if required. . .which seems to indicate the requirement for a steering wheel and pedals.

Faraday Future Is Hiring!

Posted on by

EV company is launching a second brand. . .perhaps

By Gary S. Vasilash

If there was an ROI for persistence, Faraday Future would have a market cap that would rival Tesla’s.

The company—which says it is developing AIEVs, as in “advanced intelligent electric vehicles”—first showed off a vehicle at CES, the FFZERO1, in 2016.

The following year, again at CES, the FF 91, its first “production” model was shown.

Apparently, what happens in Vegas really does stay in Vegas, because it has taken a long time for there to be any Faraday Future product on roads not associated with a glitzy intro.

In 2023 the company reportedly sold four FF 91s and leased six.

For the entire year.

The Faraday Future website allows the preordering of the FF 91 2.0 Futurist Alliance, a name that sounds like it comes out of some Star Wars knockoff.

It has a range of 381 miles, a top speed of 155 mph, and there will be just 300 produced. Globally.

The base price?

$309,000.

Although it is not an AIEV, I suspect that the Rolls-Royce Wraith might be an even more exotic expenditure of ~$300K.

But back to persistence.

Faraday Future has announced that it is hiring for a second brand, Faraday X.

Positions including production planning director and head of vehicle engineering.

The second brand is meant to create vehicles that offer “twice the performance at half the price”—but half the price of things that aren’t the FF 91 2.0 Futurist Alliance.

The FX 5 model will have an “expected price range” of $20,000 to $30,000. The FX 6 will be at $30,000 to $50,000.

There will be two powertrain types: a range-extended EV and a battery electric.

Faraday Future anticipates the vehicles will be in production by the end of 2025—“subject to securing necessary funding.”

Celebrating Auric Goldfinger?

Posted on by

Yes, it is the 60th anniversary. But he wasn’t a very nice man. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

In the movie version Goldfinger, the character Jill Masterson dies because she is painted gold. That led to her death by asphyxiation because she helped out James Bond. Auric Goldfinger, the villain in the movie, was not to be trifled with.

Simply put, he was a bad guy.

“For a golden girl knows when he’s kissed her
It’s the kiss of death from Mister Goldfinger. . .” (Image: Rolls-Royce)

Which makes it odd that Rolls-Royce has developed the Phantom Goldfinger, a one-off extended model that is a tribute to the 1937 Phantom III Sedanca de Ville that the villain had in the movie. (It was used to smuggle gold, as it had body panels made of the stuff, which would have meant a rather hefty motor car, estimated to be on the order of two tonnes.)

Because Bond and Goldfinger have their first encounter at a golf course, there is a gold-plated putter affixed to the underside of the trunk lid. The club has an “AG” monogram, which is a refence to the signet ring that Goldfinger wears.

The master plan of the villain is to set off a nuclear device at Fort Knox so that all of the gold stored there would be useless (the film was released in 1964; while Franklin Roosevelt took the U.S. off of the gold standard in 1933 for domestic transactions, it wasn’t until 1971 that Richard Nixon ended international convertibility of the dollar to gold). Consequently the villain would be wealthier.

Seems strange that Rolls-Royce would be so chuffed about celebrating a villain who once threatened James Bond with a laser beam.

About Battery Timing

Posted on by

At some point will it be analogous to buying Duracell, Eveready or Kirkland. . . ?

By Gary S. Vasilash

Compared with GM and Ford, the other company in the “Detroit 3,” Stellantis North America, which is still simply referred to as “Chrysler” in southeastern Michigan, is behind the curve when it comes to electric vehicles.

You can buy or lease an EV from GM or Ford.

But so far, with the exception of the exceptionally limited Fiat 500e (limited as in having a range of 149 miles, which is about half of what many people are interested in when thinking about an EV), there is no mainstream EV available from Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, or Alfa Romeo.

But earlier this week it announced that NextStar Energy, a joint venture between Stellantis and LG Energy Solution, has started battery module production in its plant in Windsor, Ontario. Next year it plans to launch cell manufacturing.

The Dodge Charger, electric version. (Image: Dodge)

And the company also announced that it will be operating a demo fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs with solid-state batteries from Factorial, a battery company that it has invested $75-million in.

What is interesting about the Factorial battery is that the company claims they’re working for a range of 600+ miles from a battery that is 33% smaller and 40% lighter than a conventional lithium-ion battery.

However, that fleet won’t go into operation until 2026.

So presumably if all goes well, it would still take some time before the Factorial tech makes its way into production vehicles, which explains why there is the production at NextStar Energy: they’re going to need something sooner rather than later.

Factorial is also working with Mercede-Benz. The two companies announced last month the development of a new solid-state battery technology, about which Markus Schäfer, Chief Technology Officer and Member of the Board of Management at Mercedes-Benz Group AG, said: “The Solstice solid-state battery technology represents another landmark milestone in our partnership with Factorial, which is a cornerstone of Mercedes-Benz’s strategy and commitment to leading the charge in battery development. Solstice offers further improvements in energy density and safety features that will help us develop electric vehicles that set new standards in range, cost, and performance.”

Note the future tense of “will.” Not now. But sometime.

In the meantime Mercedes gets batteries from companies including LG Energy Solution and CATL.

Mercedes, like Stellantis, has had a joint-development arrangement with Factorial since 2021.

So at some point in the future will the situation be that multiple OEMs will have access to the same battery technology and so there will be differentiators required other than charging time and range?

About Used EVs

Posted on by

What are buyers/intenders interested in?

By Gary S. Vasilash

Carvana, the purveyor of used vehicles, has discovered that EV investigators are spending more time searching based on a 226% increase in the number of page views on its site for the vehicles compared to Q3 2023.

The top five vehicles, according to its “EV Trends Report,” searched for are:

  • Tesla Model 3
  • Ford Mustang MACH-E
  • Hyundai IONIQ 5
  • Kia EV 6
  • Nissan LEAF

Given that there are hundreds of thousands of Model 3s out there right now, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that people are looking, perhaps, to score a deal on a pre-owned one.

The LEAF’s long time in market probably helps explain its presence.

But it is somewhat surprising that given that the IONIQ 5 and EV 6 are comparatively new (the Hyundai came out in December 2021 and the Kia in January 2022), they are on the list, not the Chevy Bolt, which was launched in December 2016, so there are undoubtedly more of them available on the used market.

But that is clearly ICE thinking.

Carvana found that the average model year search range for EVs was from 2020 to 2023. The average search range for ICE vehicles was 2018 to 2023.

So potential used EV buyers are interested in what’s newer.

What are the features EV searchers are interested in?

  • Third-row seat
  • Heated steering wheel
  • Apple CarPlay
  • Sunroof
  • Adaptive cruise control

Features that indicate EVs are being generally perceived as being a “regular vehicle”: ICE searchers were also interested in third-row seating and a sunroof. Rather than a heated steering wheel, it is heated seats. And Apple CarPlay and adaptive cruise are replaced by a rear-view camera and a tow hitch. (Perhaps the last-named has something to do with why the F-150 Lightning was knocked off the list and the MACH-E on it: towing with an EV is not particularly good, so EV intenders probably are no longer interested in that possibility.)

Steel and Emissions

Posted on by

Often EVs are made with steel. And steel production means CO2 emissions. . .

By Gary S. Vasilash

When people think about reducing vehicular emissions, the first—and likely only—thought is about either what comes out of the tailpipe or whether there is a tailpipe (i.e., the first in the hybrid category and the second in the EV category).

But consider what most cars, crossovers and trucks are made with: steel.

And steelmaking is a carbon-intensive process. It is estimated that steel-making accounts for about 8% of global CO2 emissions, which is just a couple of percentage points behind the auto industry (though that’s both production and use: steel is calculated on the basis of just production).

Volkswagen Group in Germany is doing something to reduce its Scope 3 (things it buys from the supply chain emissions).

It signed a memorandum of understanding with Thyssenkrupp Steel under which the latter will provide the former with low-carbon steel.

Thyssenkrupp Steel is to open a direct reduction steel plant in 2027 that will use hydrogen and green electricity to produce what it calls “bluemint Steel.”

This will be certified under various organizations as being low carbon.

Volkswagen group calculates that 15 to 20 percent of an EV’s CO2 emissions are related to the steel used in its production.

So in order to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 it has to start vigorously reducing its CO2 emissions across the board.